Shooting Jpeg Only for 6 months!
Yeah, I know - the Jpeg vs Raw debate is about as old as Canon vs Nikon -
and about as interesting (not). Any photographer worth their salt will
tell you that you should only ever shoot in Raw, and if you absolutely
HAVE to have a Jpeg (for some bizarre reason), then shoot in Raw + Jpeg
(and then throw the Jpeg away).
About a year ago, I moved over to using the Fujifilm system - namely the X-E1 and X-E2. I've absolutely fallen in love with the ergonomics, handling, and IQ from these range-finder style APS-C cameras. But if I'm honest, the main reason I wanted to try out the Fuji system - and the main reason I'll probably stay in the Fuji ecosystem for a very long time - are their film simulations.
I'm one of those
photographers, to be honest. I've pretty much only ever shot in Raw
since picking up my Nikon D70 sixteen years ago, and have never really
understood the Raw + Jpeg argument. If you've shot Raw, what on earth
would you need the (inferior) Jpeg for? Ok - maybe sports
photographers had a case for shooting jpeg once upon a time (when cards
were measured in Megabytes and not Gigs). But for 99.99% of the rest of
us, just shoot Raw. Job done.
But... (isn't there always
a but)... more recently - and I mean only in the last few years - the
allure of shooting Jpeg-only has been brewing. More and more 'serious'
photographers have been extolling the virtues of using Jpegs SOOC
(Straight Out Of Camera) because the manufacturer's Jpeg processing
engines inside their cameras are just so good! The rise of mirrorless
cameras, where you can actually see your exposure (and tweak the
highlight and shadow areas) before taking the shot, has helped hugely to
light a fire under the 'shoot Jpeg only' brigade. Expose carefully, use
a creative filter, and have the camera process it for you. Job done.
Shipwreck, Cobden Beach. Fuji X-E2 Jpeg (edited)
About a year ago, I moved over to using the Fujifilm system - namely the X-E1 and X-E2. I've absolutely fallen in love with the ergonomics, handling, and IQ from these range-finder style APS-C cameras. But if I'm honest, the main reason I wanted to try out the Fuji system - and the main reason I'll probably stay in the Fuji ecosystem for a very long time - are their film simulations.
I grew up using film, and
still shoot with film cameras from time to time (see my recent posts on
choosing a 35mm film system). So moving to a digital camera, from Fujifilm,
that shoots with film simulations like Velvia, Provia and Astia, was
almost a no-brainer! In fact, I'm not quite sure what's taken me so long
to be honest?
But... (there's that but
again)... the film simulations are only applied to Jpegs. Not
surprisingly, the Raw files are left untouched. No problem - I hear you
say. Just shoot Raw + Jpeg and have the best of both worlds. A Jpeg with
the film simulations applied, and a Raw file that you can tweak and
torture to your hearts content in Lightroom or Photoshop. And yes -
thank you - that's exactly what I've been doing. Job done.
Or
is it? Because a very large part of me isn't really very happy with
this solution. I've always thought, as mentioned earlier, that shooting
Raw + Jpeg was rather redundant. And I still do think that. I hate
coming back from a shoot with 100 photos - only that's now 200 because I
shot in two file formats, one of which I know I'm probably never going
to use! In the past, that 'redundant' file was the jpeg. Now that I'm
shooting with the Fujifilm, and utilising film simulations, the
redundant file is - well - the Raw file!
Proud grandparents. Fujifilm X-E2 Mono (no editing) |
I've
toyed (briefly) in the past with shooting Jpeg-only when I was using
Olympus gear. The Olympus Jpegs are known for being excellent SOOC, so I
tried to go Jpeg-only with them for a while. Didn't last long through,
since I wasn't really excited about their existing creative filters.
With
Fujifilm, however, their film simulations are 'next-level'. On their
own they are fantastic. But there's more! You can actually build your
own 'custom' film recipes and programme them into seven slots to recall
and use them instantly. There are many custom recipes on-line - most
famously on Fuji X Weekly, a blog run by film recipe expert
Ritchie Roesch. This means that you can pre-programme film 'simulations'
like Kodachrome 64, Kodak Tri-X and Agfa Optima into you camera and
switch between these 'looks' as the mood (or scene) dictates. For a
die-hard film shooter like me, this is absolute photography heaven!
For
example, at the moment in my X-E2 I have; Ektachrome 100SW, Fuji Acros,
Kodachrome II, Kodak Tri-X, Fujichrome Sensia 100, Kodak Ektar 100 and
Kodak Portra 400 all programmed into my custom film simulation settings.
I can flick between them almost instantly, get seven different 'film'
looks SOOC, and have minimal editing to do once I get the image home.
So
I've decided to 'bite the bullet' and shoot Jpeg-only for the next 6
months at least. Seriously. No cheating. No Raw + jpeg 'just in case'.
It will be film simulation Jpegs only for the next six months. Sounds a
bit scary. And for a die-hard Raw shooter, it is a bit scary. But
modern Jpegs - well exposed modern Jpegs - are surprisingly editable.
And If I'm happy with the film simulations, there shouldn't be much - if
any - editing required anyway?
As someone who
is more than happy shooting film - I think I'll handle Jpeg-only digital
capture for six months. Who knows, I may even go longer?
Comments
Post a Comment